{"id":"W2141149083","doi":"10.1017/s000842390277813x","title":"Ghosts of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Group Politics and Charter Litigation in Canadian Political Science","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Charter; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Law; Judicial review; Interest group","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0188638,0.0003055895,0.0006694812,0.004094128,0.04161443,0.01924623,0.002356716,0.007831094,0.004115302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04294409,0.0004648613,0.0004208905,0.005802464,0.06018522,0.004997813,0.006446062,0.007250624,0.0001774212],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1192928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1367144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9377444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9528785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.979543,0.005934333,0.0003488851,0.001401284,0.007933177,0.00483941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974484,0.01621681,0.002510688,0.0009403538,0.003959128,0.001888918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001561607,0.000009745066,0.001712621,0.00003016781,0.000006928103,0.0001121486,0.02725818,0.0003360322,0.00007123495,0.9560433,0.006761953,0.007641911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001219373,0.00005205594,0.02623656,0.0005728543,0.0001452394,0.0001764161,0.1274551,0.00332448,0.0008796412,0.5396103,0.3011822,0.0002432131],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.271651,0.01120268,0.006073168,0.3103292,0.0007910671,0.00009841189,0.0001095843,0.00006351756,0.3996814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893286,0.0009056415,0.0004340542,0.003744044,0.0001142569,0.00001356001,0.000009713664,0.00001400588,0.005436047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8807071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8655342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03817996828434821,"score_gpt":0.2649548808491777,"score_spread":0.2267749125648295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}