{"id":"W2141209297","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00995.x","title":"Wildlife Damage and Agriculture: A Dynamic Analysis of Compensation Schemes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Wildlife; Damages; Compensation (psychology); Wildlife conservation; Stock (firearms); Natural resource economics; Welfare; Business; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Market economy; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003388643,0.0007532135,0.001236851,0.001759617,0.001004666,0.003300907,0.001771869,0.004013302,0.01563152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01637584,0.0006421978,0.001314712,0.002068755,0.001937848,0.004517744,0.001487415,0.003195791,0.000826099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003988901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001434576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01626264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01001643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986765,0.0005078419,0.00004340504,0.0001690902,0.000166597,0.0004366146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912313,0.005317093,0.002131875,0.0003201974,0.0004349765,0.0005645546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002475155,0.0003158344,0.0133455,0.0001249416,0.0001712259,0.0005137089,0.000344441,0.4829551,0.001228188,0.4660637,0.0070315,0.02765835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008003233,0.0001790379,0.008939822,0.00006753514,0.0000919883,0.0002334073,0.0003347593,0.8060284,0.000182546,0.1772342,0.006564703,0.00006364822],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.615366,0.00483563,0.2901783,0.01242357,0.0002669073,0.0003544497,0.001674112,0.0003204387,0.07458062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747533,0.001438039,0.006393398,0.0002519546,0.0001435504,0.0001012732,0.0002707686,0.00004955483,0.01659815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01626264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05229264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01959887363649137,"score_gpt":0.2026950041531761,"score_spread":0.1830961305166847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}