{"id":"W2141241667","doi":"10.1109/glocom.1996.586762","title":"A new recursive method for estimating the error probability of decision feedback equalization","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersymbol interference; Equalization (audio); Computer science; Probability density function; Symbol (formal); Probability of error; Interference (communication); Equalizer; Adaptive equalizer; Algorithm; Statistics; Control theory (sociology); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Telecommunications; Control (management); Decoding methods","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001235561,0.001272926,0.0009752176,0.001564073,0.0006318477,0.0009351841,0.001290339,0.001136108,0.002289291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009229005,0.0006091133,0.0009133188,0.0010547,0.0007646165,0.001721701,0.0007539992,0.001640199,0.001340994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008358052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001156064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005068958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00564334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986188,0.0003618242,0.00006120575,0.0001959707,0.0006772213,0.00008489087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974799,0.001431379,0.0001790448,0.0003169222,0.0005587949,0.00003402024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000149667,0.0001296613,0.001978204,0.0002529711,0.000258487,0.0003106601,0.0002245697,0.3921928,0.03830073,0.06890863,0.004484494,0.4928092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001632912,0.00003945583,0.0006797215,0.00002051532,0.00004335144,0.0002902901,0.000008208324,0.9776494,0.009262286,0.008142292,0.003794952,0.00005322564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007194576,0.0000962421,0.9985681,0.00001607847,0.00002042401,0.00001530921,0.00001497404,0.0003035568,0.0002459035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0545162,0.0003983972,0.9422818,0.00006316233,0.00008331783,0.0001694734,0.0001419279,0.0001882865,0.002157412],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005068958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01007891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05848559030528315,"score_gpt":0.3411251856319406,"score_spread":0.2826395953266574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}