{"id":"W2141342136","doi":"10.1109/tpwrs.2008.922225","title":"Passivity Enforcement Using an Infeasible-Interior-Point Primal-Dual Method","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passivity; Admittance; Computer science; Dual (grammatical number); Point (geometry); Mathematical optimization; Interior point method; Quadratic equation; Quadratic programming; Control theory (sociology); Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Electrical impedance; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003158796,0.000259244,0.000341808,0.000195999,0.0001864532,0.00004455007,0.0001081901,0.0001322427,0.0003906533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005350429,0.0002546413,0.0001271941,0.0003144926,0.00003698782,0.0002247268,9.586307e-7,0.0002872943,0.00003652549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002278943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003736053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001869225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007225216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983507,0.0002659406,0.0004534345,0.0002750093,0.0002991735,0.00035569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991581,0.0001398584,0.00005513786,0.0003740523,0.00006542302,0.0002073957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004804311,0.0001499791,0.00002330447,0.00005708651,0.0001094286,0.00002010358,0.001127063,0.9266571,0.06901699,0.0001061223,0.00006367242,0.002621044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008230122,0.0006976456,0.0001871896,0.00007215137,0.00005336767,0.0003276761,0.0002048096,0.9243968,0.06980696,0.00001278339,0.00290684,0.0005108006],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08787325,0.00006067292,0.9071634,0.00001085371,0.00186941,0.0003395003,0.00001250832,0.0004348115,0.002235636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776874,0.00001599818,0.02184655,0.00005039625,0.00002987001,0.00004756574,0.000001519369,0.00005546931,0.0002652008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8898142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04389169797328125,"score_gpt":0.3094893014683678,"score_spread":0.2655976034950866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}