{"id":"W2141342136","doi":"10.1109/tpwrs.2008.922225","title":"Passivity Enforcement Using an Infeasible-Interior-Point Primal-Dual Method","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passivity; Admittance; Computer science; Dual (grammatical number); Point (geometry); Mathematical optimization; Interior point method; Quadratic equation; Quadratic programming; Control theory (sociology); Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Electrical impedance; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002673143,0.001225859,0.001550825,0.0007738085,0.0005537183,0.001574102,0.001197183,0.001247847,0.00423412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003900843,0.0007053606,0.001149537,0.0004606177,0.001067083,0.001120728,0.001607392,0.002023668,0.0005752298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007488618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001673288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003127899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002033411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992003,0.0004088325,0.0000338896,0.00008134121,0.0002120301,0.00006357998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986967,0.0008046282,0.0001262835,0.0001098542,0.0002086799,0.00005376744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006069183,0.00004520396,0.0001887717,0.00007555303,0.00002411248,0.0001105028,0.00004923461,0.9511034,0.001226054,0.03286288,0.0009577107,0.01329586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005496861,0.000008657836,0.000009901146,0.000003896,0.000002645005,0.000008049099,0.000003216213,0.9969193,0.0002086349,0.002495982,0.0003322762,0.000002064571],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002029868,0.00002825152,0.9960044,0.00005239886,0.00001447895,0.00002010642,0.00001612984,0.00008636262,0.001748038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3206581,0.0001861556,0.6724209,0.0001401854,0.0000635021,0.0003234443,0.0001562122,0.0002764541,0.005775123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00423412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01416451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04389169797328125,"score_gpt":0.3094893014683678,"score_spread":0.2655976034950866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}