{"id":"W2141355259","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2010.505712","title":"Critical reflection and prenatal screening public education materials: a metaphoric textual analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reflective Practice","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Directive; Metaphor; Guideline; Literal and figurative language; Critical reflection; Reflection (computer programming); Psychology; Prenatal screening; Medicine; Prenatal diagnosis; Pedagogy; Medical education; Sociology; Nursing; Pregnancy; Linguistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001317422,0.0002028012,0.0002925143,0.0006268117,0.000314219,0.0003366362,0.0001229242,0.0002396603,0.001568207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00412385,0.0001977677,0.00009754186,0.001348047,0.0001304702,0.001427183,0.00005371307,0.0005938344,0.0001360829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004993612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001110973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000754529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003002708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974505,0.0009519356,0.0003178901,0.0006359073,0.0002843459,0.0003594674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975373,0.001032304,0.00022371,0.0003672531,0.0006720233,0.0001673978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002189333,0.003129531,0.001386156,0.00008695813,0.006317137,0.00007192522,0.01479502,6.186795e-7,0.2078507,0.3263284,0.001536861,0.4363074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007221655,0.003865361,0.2748787,0.0001526262,0.04950276,0.007850829,0.2341803,0.0004398315,0.1194498,0.06360961,0.2333964,0.005452104],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7458255,0.001085488,0.02586906,0.00280787,0.002685826,0.0005639362,0.00004810126,0.0002702972,0.2208439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874052,0.00002949414,0.01009624,0.0006083307,0.0006546813,0.000193328,0.00008843992,0.00002925737,0.0008950334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4308553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0368648541590857,"score_gpt":0.404305231063434,"score_spread":0.3674403769043483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}