{"id":"W2141388399","doi":"10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.08.009","title":"Performance of precautionary reference points in providing management advice on North Sea fish stocks","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Status quo; Stock (firearms); Stock assessment; Fishery; Advice (programming); Fish stock; Precautionary principle; Environmental science; Fisheries management; Environmental resource management; Business; Actuarial science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001153188,0.0001098335,0.0001592596,0.0002417009,0.0001242231,0.00003654643,0.000972447,0.00002415124,0.0006113949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007049974,0.00008928261,0.00003375065,0.001108192,0.0004557421,0.001070543,0.001031903,0.0002963216,0.00002100708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003296565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009090018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003414071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003765241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977339,0.00003152768,0.0004164414,0.0002445237,0.001236352,0.0003372383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999272,0.00002894527,0.0002794683,0.000226928,0.00006179528,0.000130866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001722375,0.0001797387,0.9271087,0.00005080296,0.000004253297,0.00003973688,0.0001794145,0.005160198,0.000163075,0.0000703953,0.00004990121,0.06682152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005565616,0.0007224441,0.993817,0.00008430968,0.000004374045,0.00003308325,0.0000774505,0.001646732,0.0007879756,0.0001831289,0.00197181,0.000115132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8194478,0.000001476107,0.000008226836,0.0002889802,0.00005723897,0.0001281478,0.000001137361,0.000004904028,0.1800621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968008,0.0001383428,0.002380871,0.0001112465,0.00001862386,0.00000412504,7.935109e-7,0.000004779734,0.0005403677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1795217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6694345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0165210584626326,"score_gpt":0.2533626292473773,"score_spread":0.2368415707847447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}