{"id":"W2141388399","doi":"10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.08.009","title":"Performance of precautionary reference points in providing management advice on North Sea fish stocks","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Status quo; Stock (firearms); Stock assessment; Fishery; Advice (programming); Fish stock; Precautionary principle; Environmental science; Fisheries management; Environmental resource management; Business; Actuarial science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02510935,0.0007008921,0.0005805361,0.002465454,0.0006968294,0.001278001,0.001485867,0.001238774,0.0007680689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1123397,0.000308446,0.0005540755,0.001037262,0.0004926097,0.001333172,0.000945939,0.000643306,0.000302028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001690005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001773207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02058244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01884233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857031,0.008181645,0.0009909283,0.0009476569,0.003887906,0.0002888374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8894483,0.07915435,0.01171139,0.002855602,0.01562472,0.001205528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007212318,0.001104474,0.3371988,0.0007557328,0.00058964,0.000364593,0.003257663,0.1862094,0.01041274,0.001670976,0.001718799,0.4495049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004345546,0.01797093,0.4044357,0.0008073382,0.0006540605,0.0003429538,0.003614839,0.5296984,0.03298055,0.002985556,0.005578868,0.0004962414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787678,0.0003863511,0.0165963,0.0002619713,0.00005044177,0.0002774793,0.0002007079,0.0004100189,0.003048971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751837,0.00009200857,0.02388497,0.00004369525,0.000008276988,0.00008781963,0.0001572503,0.00001181971,0.0005305579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02510935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1327925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0165210584626326,"score_gpt":0.2533626292473773,"score_spread":0.2368415707847447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}