{"id":"W2141505345","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2007.2198","title":"Could increased boreal forest ecosystem productivity offset carbon losses from increased disturbances?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Taiga; Environmental science; Primary production; Disturbance (geology); Ecosystem; Climate change; Ecology; Boreal ecosystem; Productivity; Boreal; Forest ecology; Carbon cycle; Atmospheric sciences; Agroforestry; Physical geography; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001010751,0.0004077527,0.0003616675,0.0002962275,0.000544935,0.001272763,0.0004904893,0.0006703904,0.002240601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002329856,0.0001313459,0.0003184464,0.0004286941,0.0006221504,0.001866898,0.0005480102,0.0003027843,0.0001649544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001589425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001042594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0242099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04811826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999762,0.00003660136,0.0000138093,0.00005050597,0.00003573577,0.0001013053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994129,0.00009177723,0.0001930847,0.00005810363,0.0001373832,0.0001067475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00130078,0.0002885619,0.6963702,0.000591563,0.0006703114,0.0009457127,0.0003652437,0.0757644,0.03370127,0.03055151,0.002880883,0.1565695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009894086,0.0004623615,0.9069736,0.00006785652,0.0001709779,0.000729717,0.001336862,0.04496603,0.004986765,0.03002409,0.01012179,0.00006096394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810285,0.000874303,0.00378144,0.001903516,0.00008202648,0.00001680094,0.0002703949,0.00007671973,0.01196628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985774,0.000236355,0.0006524678,0.0001509147,0.00001676578,0.000004646763,0.00005035677,0.000007558722,0.000303599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0242099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04813802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0206217735951198,"score_gpt":0.2369929662825922,"score_spread":0.2163711926874724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}