{"id":"W2141506510","doi":"10.1002/smr.299","title":"Improving design quality using meta‐pattern transformations: a metric‐based approach","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution Research and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Metric (unit); Business process reengineering; Task (project management); Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Software engineering; Object-oriented design; Metamodeling; Data mining; Software; Systems engineering; Programming language; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01727306,0.0001508493,0.0003160523,0.0007938123,0.00040459,0.0004289271,0.0004704221,0.00009212635,0.000002426092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02608519,0.0001165684,0.00009417166,0.001340983,0.0001748923,0.003157678,0.0001238755,0.0008876344,0.000002208192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003561986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007441383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000460951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002625357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964612,0.0009734127,0.0005185985,0.0002815409,0.001223399,0.000541887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891448,0.008125274,0.0002922464,0.0002855997,0.001848838,0.0003032527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008034361,0.006086275,0.01675728,0.006186658,0.006406748,0.001666174,0.01441947,0.4591981,0.01228856,0.04467098,0.00363203,0.4206534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.029425,0.01387314,0.07692242,0.002046102,0.001796642,0.02300471,0.01029118,0.7488203,0.005427501,0.07335092,0.0110677,0.003974366],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00327572,0.004794226,0.9896255,0.001920151,0.00007074972,0.0002476792,0.000003103458,0.00004530348,0.00001757187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5136842,0.000277901,0.485888,0.00007979169,0.00004073498,0.00001058159,3.654746e-7,0.000008877942,0.000009578346],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5104084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1719449302807982,"score_gpt":0.3877511257659865,"score_spread":0.2158061954851883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}