{"id":"W2141531973","doi":"10.1177/1743872109339109","title":"Having Your Porn and Condemning it Too: A Case Study of a “Kiddie Porn” Expose","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Rhetorical question; Child pornography; Sexualization; Sociology; Taboo; Narrative; Rhetoric; Media studies; Performative utterance; Contradiction; Voyeurism; Aesthetics; Psychology; Criminology; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Art; The Internet; Literature; Human sexuality; Epistemology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002829458,0.001385764,0.0009603135,0.002517496,0.02480823,0.006143121,0.002597242,0.007398033,0.005377238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01109137,0.001267331,0.0008237161,0.001842011,0.01311349,0.005870414,0.007270893,0.007703112,0.0008817263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004303959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002260517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01306279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03892561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956214,0.002807086,0.000136329,0.0003017986,0.000434153,0.0006992565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963612,0.001957883,0.000497698,0.000208225,0.000245274,0.0007297643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003841292,0.0002085494,0.003513257,0.0001565469,0.0000139964,0.04201721,0.9371363,0.00006813891,0.0004901535,0.008147168,0.003413443,0.004796789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004332906,0.00006203682,0.001374043,0.0001963181,0.00001254949,0.02104625,0.9494518,0.00009700096,0.0004598617,0.000696498,0.02657764,0.00002170945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9489694,0.001476675,0.001929368,0.0146456,0.0004417443,0.0001621684,0.0001210991,0.00004255608,0.0322113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777095,0.002526786,0.001508226,0.002759633,0.0001863172,0.0001128339,0.00005462403,0.0001009453,0.01504109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02480823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03122759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08324905464131462,"score_gpt":0.3231634378619522,"score_spread":0.2399143832206376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}