{"id":"W2141531973","doi":"10.1177/1743872109339109","title":"Having Your Porn and Condemning it Too: A Case Study of a “Kiddie Porn” Expose","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Rhetorical question; Child pornography; Sexualization; Sociology; Taboo; Narrative; Rhetoric; Media studies; Performative utterance; Contradiction; Voyeurism; Aesthetics; Psychology; Criminology; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Art; The Internet; Literature; Human sexuality; Epistemology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004403531,0.0001086864,0.0002073495,0.00001793949,0.001228584,0.0001710515,0.00009482172,0.00005837351,0.00001945863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004039991,0.00006944502,0.00003456914,0.00004330665,0.0006067585,0.0001543196,0.00003249546,0.0001201008,7.153582e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008040076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002833481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005167091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02050207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991801,0.0001337777,0.0001667103,0.0001431311,0.0001888797,0.000187447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996214,0.00007653756,0.00008606612,0.0001037949,0.00006388414,0.00004832491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001499332,0.00005191973,0.0001110833,0.000007179089,0.0000207107,0.0001222408,0.7219976,1.189967e-7,0.00002902849,0.2770686,0.0001889454,0.0003876571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00101601,0.0001635998,0.0001293782,0.00002147574,0.00008150048,0.0001057014,0.94919,9.053759e-7,0.00002311046,0.006223888,0.04294144,0.0001030207],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8312027,0.00188133,0.000001338317,0.0002484969,0.0001036844,0.0003083432,0.000003916234,0.00003009096,0.1662201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849148,0.0001547924,0.00001679043,0.001086835,0.0002007741,0.00000880709,0.000001278661,0.000004424873,0.01361148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2708447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08324905464131462,"score_gpt":0.3231634378619522,"score_spread":0.2399143832206376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}