{"id":"W2141564171","doi":"10.1017/s1481803500012380","title":"Effect of an emergency department sepsis protocol on time to antibiotics in severe sepsis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; University of Calgary; South Health Campus","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Sepsis; Emergency department; Antibiotics; Guideline; Surviving Sepsis Campaign; Protocol (science); Confidence interval; Emergency medicine; Retrospective cohort study; Intensive care medicine; Internal medicine; Severe sepsis; Septic shock; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001014367,0.0003308755,0.0008884359,0.0008686059,0.00006627216,0.000002831845,0.0002385809,0.0001528038,0.02517306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000909821,0.0002280537,0.0002210351,0.0007025711,0.00005692528,0.00008866284,0.00001138366,0.0004312908,0.00009734802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001998954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004868667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002281183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01486272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973195,0.0001458854,0.001250112,0.0002832123,0.0005245141,0.0004767751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969497,0.00008360401,0.0003936472,0.0004852782,0.000351172,0.001736636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00131003,0.001255544,0.7657565,0.0006242649,0.0006248738,0.001256814,0.001277448,0.0001308181,0.01297183,0.00006171931,0.1856081,0.02912209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01718841,0.08161463,0.6763031,0.003077222,0.001535897,0.000265357,0.0002450101,0.0001927724,0.04647202,0.0001577297,0.1720299,0.0009179842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756222,0.00007551341,0.000001820468,0.003358318,0.002058978,0.01443005,0.00002845538,0.000007183016,0.004417431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970955,0.00003745479,0.0002207806,0.0002967453,0.0008732986,0.0005914138,0.00002402688,0.0000578382,0.0008028874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08945342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05687003908376744,"score_gpt":0.3911325884099026,"score_spread":0.3342625493261352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}