{"id":"W2141564380","doi":"10.5558/tfc80341-3","title":"An ecological rationale for sustainable forest management concepts at Riverside Forest Products, southcentral British Columbia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western Forest Products; Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable forest management; Forest management; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Geography; Forest ecology; Zoning; Ecology; Agroforestry; Forestry; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Political science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003167369,0.0001727819,0.0001602891,0.00001617158,0.001067809,0.0003537205,0.0006931307,0.0000818346,0.002781679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003630686,0.0001886565,0.0001009508,0.0002472711,0.0005968946,0.0005491997,0.0005018502,0.0001117787,0.00059716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009893187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004500122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01027626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08372534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979514,0.00004086247,0.0002453304,0.0005143676,0.0003268835,0.0009211711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991674,0.00003629831,0.0001069932,0.0005108063,0.00002459292,0.0001539518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001745247,0.001097911,0.3047928,0.0002271063,0.0001164439,0.0002188212,0.0009225006,0.2787861,0.00009442363,0.03769433,0.3747055,0.001169666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004322079,0.000720095,0.7623218,0.00002642349,0.0001082664,0.00004081932,0.0006914583,0.003960421,0.0000810386,0.03622331,0.1909251,0.0005791412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988295,0.0000490106,0.0001064241,0.0008239458,0.00009835667,0.002168428,0.00002657005,0.0001110221,0.008321244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481258,0.00002435525,0.0007621848,0.0004296842,0.0002040254,0.0002629918,0.0001458898,0.00002938379,0.05001564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4575291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008380413228588181,"score_gpt":0.225130644212981,"score_spread":0.2167502309843929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}