{"id":"W2141667279","doi":"10.1139/x07-191","title":"Growth and physiology of loblolly pine in response to long-term resource management: defining growth potential in the southern United States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Fertigation; Loblolly pine; Biomass (ecology); Irrigation; Agronomy; Weed control; Biology; Productivity; Weed; Basal area; Botany; Pinus <genus>; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001486803,0.0001192003,0.0001103076,0.000173796,0.0001926025,0.000178332,0.00009118879,0.0001168876,0.0003171264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000199847,0.00007386448,0.00007703554,0.0001191317,0.0001873746,0.0001439356,0.0001471427,0.0001366045,0.00004030658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005910373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002139575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05465468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2117997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999626,0.000008303774,0.000002273497,0.000009215718,0.000008391839,0.000009268797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999844,0.0000186338,0.00004419128,0.000007931286,0.00003309648,0.00005205417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004726667,0.0002150605,0.9391521,0.0000294797,0.00005105924,0.0002626996,0.0007856733,0.0004484367,0.04710631,0.000036077,0.0002658791,0.01117442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001627137,0.0000459612,0.9993488,0.000001402777,0.000003746105,0.00002865413,0.000138904,0.0001157933,0.0002101344,0.000005890067,0.00009791974,0.000001119067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998106,0.0000509842,0.00001719117,0.00001058457,5.97182e-7,8.885826e-7,0.0000331353,0.000001266945,0.00007471591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996586,0.00004083884,0.00002859498,0.00001906461,8.142129e-7,0.000002535234,0.0001086201,5.083023e-7,0.0001404643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05465468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1086731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01633416181818174,"score_gpt":0.2499817507684812,"score_spread":0.2336475889502995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}