{"id":"W2141781571","doi":"10.1109/iccad.1990.129833","title":"Tautology checking using cross-controllability and cross-observability relations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Observability; Controllability; Formal equivalence checking; Equivalence relation; Computer science; Binary decision diagram; Tautology (logic); Formal verification; Theoretical computer science; Equivalence (formal languages); Modular design; Algorithm; Mathematics; Programming language; Discrete mathematics; Applied mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001240534,0.0001192865,0.0001763023,0.00005124721,0.0003551351,0.0003224437,0.0004179441,0.0001286228,0.0002016153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000979356,0.0001124045,0.00004847094,0.0003358709,0.0003437031,0.001415929,0.000227194,0.0001612855,0.00003198592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001008943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000212721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006636199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006543729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984946,0.0001841922,0.0003934465,0.000504108,0.0001542283,0.0002694053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985794,0.0002206951,0.0001196928,0.0008196903,0.0001818227,0.00007866163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007550162,0.00009272978,0.7931775,0.00002560817,0.00001134368,0.000001481539,0.0006429107,0.001903541,0.00202117,0.182522,0.0000199694,0.01957422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002035918,0.00001627634,0.3645268,0.000001894087,0.000002347171,0.00001454966,0.000003520362,0.6271279,0.0006658403,0.007066746,0.0002788045,0.00009169872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.527238,0.0000725304,0.4688471,0.0001472707,0.0001980413,0.0001234847,8.074685e-7,0.0001406367,0.003232217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5644104,0.000001560796,0.43529,0.00007443615,0.00001773065,0.000005490633,2.138498e-7,0.000003326264,0.0001968276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6252244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4583721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1034849016649723,"score_gpt":0.3671955910447949,"score_spread":0.2637106893798226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}