{"id":"W2141790070","doi":"10.1136/vr.156.25.793","title":"The 2001 epidemic of foot‐and‐mouth disease in the United Kingdom: epidemiological and meteorological case studies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Veterinary Record","topic":"Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Met Office; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government","keywords":"Environmental science; Plume; Epidemiology; Outbreak; Virus; Transmission (telecommunications); Foot-and-mouth disease; Meteorology; Veterinary medicine; Atmospheric sciences; Virology; Biology; Geography; Medicine; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002233659,0.0001811648,0.0003565801,0.00002118033,0.0003064852,0.00001720013,0.0002433546,0.00007564569,0.00004196216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001532138,0.00004790815,0.00009060275,0.0002410344,0.00050875,0.00006726489,0.0002976301,0.0001763695,0.000005519385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001285217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003497517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974701,0.001295784,0.0004404395,0.0003280467,0.00007931222,0.000386251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945661,0.005065623,0.0001377221,0.00008941301,0.00002619584,0.0001149635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002704636,0.0002935715,0.7358374,0.0000697167,0.0001509758,0.001757685,0.0003158295,0.00003826051,0.001709994,0.01071622,0.006489101,0.2399166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002230849,0.001423674,0.9337118,0.00002317345,0.00006217496,0.0002524882,0.0009382762,0.001987441,6.21295e-7,0.005907305,0.05527404,0.0001959383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832189,0.002198777,0.00000218582,0.01414094,0.00004753753,0.0002722938,0.00001312495,0.00002600145,0.00008020294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951096,0.002796938,0.0001358684,0.001702078,0.0001507512,0.00005612002,0.00001053593,9.273169e-7,0.00003717503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2397207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2357267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2443933399683473,"score_gpt":0.3602568524281732,"score_spread":0.115863512459826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}