{"id":"W2141806469","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0638-y","title":"A counterexample to a conjecture of Schwartz","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tournament; Conjecture; Counterexample; Transitive relation; Constructive; Mathematics; Constructive proof; Combinatorics; Vertex (graph theory); Mathematical economics; Partition (number theory); Discrete mathematics; Probabilistic logic; Set (abstract data type); Graph; Computer science; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005221418,0.0008777943,0.00229963,0.001691001,0.002743108,0.004243517,0.002223651,0.00737932,0.01695709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0284563,0.0006217317,0.001635089,0.002601315,0.01149545,0.013395,0.004943464,0.006027289,0.001826902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001927249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001341772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001335882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006998392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971963,0.001243351,0.0001221089,0.000677774,0.000463841,0.0002965578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813501,0.01490992,0.0008843021,0.001442085,0.0009760964,0.0004374396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003895778,0.00002332563,0.0002245972,0.00003592,0.00001583951,0.00005160035,0.0001395037,0.0003851616,0.00006260122,0.9864423,0.009787083,0.002793131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001758485,0.00000440238,0.00005511167,0.00001119716,0.000004510916,0.00003009618,0.00003224814,0.001203185,0.00002769241,0.9966187,0.001990973,0.000004196113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1525415,0.003507635,0.1900831,0.401867,0.003860268,0.0001147013,0.001171861,0.0005441933,0.2463097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9223817,0.002901843,0.02466398,0.02037706,0.004952101,0.0003444128,0.000324383,0.000206258,0.02384818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01695709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05672705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1164556791020004,"score_gpt":0.4210391381163142,"score_spread":0.3045834590143137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}