{"id":"W2141829540","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00033.x","title":"Sensitivity of stable isotope mixing models to variation in isotopic ratios: evaluating consequences of lipid extraction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Trophic level; Isotope; Mixing (physics); Stable isotope ratio; Isotope analysis; Sensitivity (control systems); Biological system; Extraction (chemistry); δ13C; Environmental science; Isotopes of carbon; Chemistry; Biology; Ecology; Physics; Chromatography; Nuclear physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006865097,0.00007931556,0.0002607456,0.0001781915,0.00005715777,0.000003571357,0.00006292839,0.0001770381,0.0002371343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009231044,0.00008455789,0.00002266284,0.0003634182,0.0002016295,0.0003131375,0.00008356045,0.000209628,0.000003775873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001578494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003741348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002926563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03137775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975697,0.001461972,0.0004287651,0.0002590271,0.00009561938,0.0001848471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988714,0.0007212122,0.0002137835,0.0001411329,0.00002799542,0.00002448281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001720772,0.00004422463,0.4296272,0.000005899113,0.000003487851,6.043796e-7,0.0005727904,0.03576826,0.5290036,0.0005798148,0.000002298467,0.004374584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001989049,0.00009178466,0.8242201,0.000005801392,0.00001243136,0.000006483747,0.0001852164,0.1423738,0.02049906,0.01233058,0.000008346437,0.00006750101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8650837,0.000007030017,0.1336794,0.0001562019,0.0002283511,0.0002559991,9.837108e-7,0.000004944106,0.000583363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7823965,0.000006442478,0.2174917,0.00003592914,0.00001265183,0.00002779047,8.341538e-7,0.000002972649,0.00002513471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5085045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03822854713765485,"score_gpt":0.3599052327869808,"score_spread":0.321676685649326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}