{"id":"W2141870550","doi":"10.1109/lmwc.2004.827099","title":"Stability analysis of the CE-FDTD method","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Stability (learning theory); Limit (mathematics); Mathematics; Numerical analysis; Envelope (radar); Numerical stability; Mathematical analysis; Bounded function; Instability; Upper and lower bounds; Time domain; Finite difference method; Physics; Mechanics; Optics; Computer science; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006820763,0.0003967111,0.0004425771,0.0005521944,0.0005796761,0.0007047589,0.0008473926,0.0008565926,0.004252143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003423748,0.0002501589,0.0004395485,0.0003103997,0.0007206482,0.0007388886,0.0008500419,0.0008177906,0.001167214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000739531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001062997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003895008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001270772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996145,0.0000654292,0.0000143128,0.00004495442,0.0002311685,0.00002957377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987488,0.0005210863,0.00006941154,0.00007623773,0.0005464865,0.00003800255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001453944,0.00004879855,0.001082875,0.0003119855,0.00003423836,0.000264802,0.0003650393,0.6440648,0.05909868,0.2221922,0.0039667,0.06842441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004061054,0.000005820654,0.00007381137,0.00001390196,0.000002061055,0.00003797071,0.00001028142,0.9897364,0.004541821,0.002902386,0.002664489,0.000006991395],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006094731,0.0002952632,0.9864346,0.0001587369,0.00005556388,0.00003849898,0.00003507646,0.0001514596,0.006736201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5657883,0.001162614,0.404459,0.0002091239,0.0001120988,0.0004325733,0.000276411,0.0004157312,0.02714413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004252143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01422483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01795795494931063,"score_gpt":0.2474249432238156,"score_spread":0.2294669882745049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}