{"id":"W2141899511","doi":"10.1002/2014jd022635","title":"Assessing the limits of bias‐correcting climate model outputs for climate change impact studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Climate change; Precipitation; Climate model; Climatology; Environmental science; Econometrics; Magnitude (astronomy); Meteorology; Mathematics; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0907371,0.001346324,0.0008455366,0.001865436,0.001053472,0.002962651,0.001869207,0.00192947,0.0008835997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2620246,0.0006476769,0.001883369,0.002332262,0.001610674,0.003571023,0.002947303,0.001883745,0.0002473894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001863137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003503986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02173971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00992266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9653038,0.02662468,0.002078111,0.00148218,0.003844197,0.0006669348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6742548,0.2620541,0.02000882,0.02330877,0.01910686,0.001266639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001208826,0.0002216472,0.2738147,0.0005716858,0.0021706,0.0001893472,0.0005350538,0.6177789,0.002992212,0.01234451,0.001822805,0.08634961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027782,0.0007243862,0.06887624,0.0003990309,0.0005555126,0.00009455965,0.0003483816,0.8993936,0.009154773,0.01544674,0.004572221,0.000156797],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7228236,0.002191961,0.2528224,0.00324409,0.0003743518,0.0006778784,0.002200184,0.001819475,0.01384609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613557,0.0001779027,0.03719071,0.0002395118,0.00005231082,0.0001785762,0.0004328103,0.0001452347,0.0002272073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0907371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4798694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4142824386387444,"score_gpt":0.4814396272271194,"score_spread":0.067157188588375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}