{"id":"W2141929795","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2010.09.005","title":"Can a good offense be a good defense? Vulnerability testing of anomaly detectors through an artificial arms race","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Soft Computing","topic":"Network Security and Intrusion Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Computer security; Computer science; Anomaly detection; Detector; Intrusion detection system; Arms race; Anomaly (physics); Evasion (ethics); Strengths and weaknesses; Artificial intelligence; Telecommunications; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001315524,0.0003219264,0.0004435027,0.0001061413,0.0006311439,0.0001902578,0.0008712137,0.0002304536,0.00001282283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003159318,0.0003322762,0.0001142713,0.001076653,0.0001901291,0.0003746061,0.0004727859,0.0008971247,0.000007868362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000460422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001424451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004862924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000649675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971322,0.0001551607,0.0007366039,0.0008910092,0.000460339,0.0006246986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972714,0.0008747891,0.0004815461,0.0009886565,0.0002066585,0.000176976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009445916,0.0007420664,0.00686474,0.00011619,0.00006613731,0.0000189266,0.01922936,0.007664656,0.504486,0.1298556,0.00003413352,0.3308277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009777428,0.0005982803,0.008772251,0.0000696689,0.0000484496,0.0001309523,0.0006039536,0.7211735,0.2131608,0.05244547,0.0008286588,0.001190316],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8374472,0.00001026821,0.1598268,0.0001839251,0.0006888366,0.0003157345,0.00000315186,0.0004474949,0.001076532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8689767,4.867196e-7,0.1303857,0.0002352745,0.0003623321,0.000009750263,0.00000318517,0.000024136,0.000002438334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7135088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02791967796935969,"score_gpt":0.2542861376355752,"score_spread":0.2263664596662155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}