{"id":"W2141929795","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2010.09.005","title":"Can a good offense be a good defense? Vulnerability testing of anomaly detectors through an artificial arms race","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Soft Computing","topic":"Network Security and Intrusion Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Computer security; Computer science; Anomaly detection; Detector; Intrusion detection system; Arms race; Anomaly (physics); Evasion (ethics); Strengths and weaknesses; Artificial intelligence; Telecommunications; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005122757,0.0005310124,0.0005866069,0.0008074651,0.0009207149,0.002510359,0.001183279,0.00261921,0.002450564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03690195,0.0003708323,0.0005307513,0.0004006922,0.004487017,0.007314734,0.001724563,0.002304733,0.0004511818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006100761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007973718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006813526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000697126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964337,0.001583996,0.0001430282,0.0005002803,0.001056176,0.0002826945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778088,0.01518508,0.001653748,0.003344386,0.001638298,0.0003697338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00172267,0.000842417,0.03745486,0.0004421507,0.0004986807,0.001327184,0.002041421,0.1648334,0.06905812,0.3861841,0.01111322,0.3244818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007879937,0.000939718,0.003509571,0.0001229727,0.0001391768,0.001080165,0.0006626728,0.5685149,0.02872608,0.3885096,0.007599599,0.0001168726],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.569805,0.0007909973,0.3918265,0.0173455,0.0004439933,0.0001208711,0.0001087623,0.001120152,0.01843834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711365,0.00009883467,0.02713124,0.0004964814,0.00002781312,0.00002467737,0.00002402129,0.00003817356,0.001022323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005122757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02709204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02791967796935969,"score_gpt":0.2542861376355752,"score_spread":0.2263664596662155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}