{"id":"W2141974388","doi":"10.5539/enrr.v2n3p71","title":"Composite Goodness of Fit in Reaeration Coeffcient Modeling","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goodness of fit; Ranking (information retrieval); Statistics; Coefficient of determination; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001508387,0.00008626637,0.0001149758,0.00008683772,0.0001373361,0.00002123691,0.0001294649,0.00005665444,0.0004483109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001378525,0.00007077926,0.00002462525,0.000161531,0.0002352869,0.0002212424,0.0002958472,0.0002809369,0.0000895739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001774925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002280337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005146474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002795362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982294,0.0003040352,0.0002187625,0.0001885623,0.0006827677,0.0003764116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996212,0.0000796301,0.00003537141,0.0001478844,0.00000294908,0.0001129442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003372698,0.0008373529,0.750861,0.00007313497,0.00002315355,0.000004688643,0.02206591,0.03390809,0.1671279,0.0006511343,0.0004151757,0.02369512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001112197,0.0001806314,0.8350396,0.00006797017,0.000009560436,0.000006358303,0.00162068,0.1144094,0.0187318,0.000367673,0.02807023,0.0003839958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974647,0.0006914254,0.0000817741,0.0002880789,0.00003597032,0.0001880146,0.000002981918,0.000005369455,0.001241736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984678,0.000183201,0.0003526479,0.00002889003,0.00003237662,0.00001250168,0.000006755615,0.000005820401,0.0009099944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1483961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.490869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.086708404843143,"score_gpt":0.3541143144709621,"score_spread":0.2674059096278191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}