{"id":"W2142204509","doi":"10.1007/s10980-011-9683-2","title":"Impact of species-specific dispersal and regional stochasticity on estimates of population viability in stream metapopulations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape Ecology","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Metapopulation; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Occupancy; Biology; Population viability analysis; Population; Mark and recapture; Habitat; Endangered species","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001313459,0.00008035184,0.0002065223,0.0000600957,0.00004316072,0.000001110051,0.00006277147,0.00005481309,0.001700168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005777909,0.00006500199,0.00003703327,0.0001009945,0.0001977509,0.00006541531,0.00008365494,0.00005443816,0.000006458936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005056236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000223717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006398912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01146954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999395,0.00004115362,0.0001968646,0.0001773481,0.00006043115,0.0001292687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996112,0.0001516974,0.00009912539,0.0001113538,0.00000501127,0.00002158781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008724562,0.0002589074,0.9963422,0.000005137158,0.00002429308,8.50794e-7,0.0002675946,0.001184218,0.00004737466,0.00119731,0.00051216,0.00007266829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002765757,0.0003472797,0.9961159,0.000002298159,0.00001433264,7.001041e-7,0.00005732294,0.001395467,0.00001184884,0.00172012,0.000005183578,0.00005299914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950714,0.000004020614,0.00008930489,0.00004541044,0.00004299565,0.0001648307,0.000009723182,0.000007073438,0.004565202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995901,0.00001113862,0.0003321251,0.00001353986,0.000005659695,0.000009715634,0.00001690356,0.000003129003,0.00001768503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01082965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02682234057937745,"score_gpt":0.2494511618202871,"score_spread":0.2226288212409097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}