{"id":"W2142473360","doi":"10.1109/mwsym.2005.1516556","title":"Domain Decomposition FDTD Algorithm Combining with Numerical TL Calibration Technique for Parameter Extraction of Substrate Integrated Circuits","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005.","topic":"Microwave Engineering and Waveguides","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Domain decomposition methods; Calibration; Electronic circuit; Computer science; Algorithm; Extraction (chemistry); Substrate (aquarium); Decomposition; Domain (mathematical analysis); Electronic engineering; Mathematics; Optics; Engineering; Electrical engineering; Physics; Chemistry; Finite element method; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002708342,0.0003984398,0.0003617471,0.000327333,0.00007379745,0.000104703,0.0002726426,0.0002288219,0.00003601201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001110608,0.0003971671,0.000153511,0.0001891629,0.00006833436,0.0005067093,0.0000148617,0.0003263299,0.00001255877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003798471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005543028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002791369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002682681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981673,0.00004213621,0.0006928639,0.0003891961,0.000281635,0.0004268643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990526,0.000171344,0.0001860955,0.0002405801,0.0002267994,0.0001225745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005269645,0.0001291744,0.000118687,0.00005767439,0.0001842044,0.000009012801,0.0001760657,0.08203238,0.9136211,0.0003987946,0.0009494762,0.002270732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008045694,0.0001346236,0.0001672249,0.0002252359,0.0000457833,0.0002897717,0.00003318331,0.1368929,0.8529153,0.0001874285,0.00785481,0.0004491991],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1033045,0.0001013432,0.89287,0.0002718185,0.0007407711,0.0005950044,0.000176161,0.0002845222,0.001655926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9141771,0.0000928244,0.08438795,0.00005243372,0.0003778709,0.0001987501,0.0003957134,0.0001075726,0.0002098047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8108726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008767229552085212,"score_gpt":0.2417325123037631,"score_spread":0.2329652827516779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}