{"id":"W2142556411","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00305.x","title":"A critical analysis of the ubiquity of linear local–regional richness relationships","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Species richness; Metacommunity; Ecology; Inference; Diversity (politics); Geography; Argument (complex analysis); Economic geography; Biology; Sociology; Computer science; Biological dispersal","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001284056,0.0000384199,0.0001032501,0.00002619563,0.0001302735,0.000001628399,0.0001103044,0.00004285292,0.001216852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001955455,0.00002645273,0.00007171607,0.0004323762,0.0006089577,0.00006551848,0.00009159422,0.00007851738,0.00006945364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002165076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004929357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001390724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006236311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994969,0.00007642947,0.0001444512,0.00008544279,0.0001243188,0.00007248458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994616,0.0003029208,0.00005480363,0.000131975,0.00002983936,0.00001885643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001877436,0.00006476579,0.9830042,0.000005621665,0.00007815561,1.116344e-7,0.0003803165,0.007977651,0.0001861988,0.007854538,0.0002876578,0.0001589467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003802749,0.000008351109,0.9453115,0.000002266404,0.0001223444,3.292433e-7,0.0001655607,0.05100059,0.00008271458,0.00319468,0.00004488793,0.00002870333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862023,0.0000168236,0.006104727,0.001650857,0.00003380941,0.00007500532,0.000004690336,0.000005177036,0.005906611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990143,0.000003139552,0.0005374397,0.00008326002,0.000003435067,0.000011887,0.000001685305,0.000001630684,0.0003432586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04302293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.021371227980425,"score_gpt":0.2642096274850499,"score_spread":0.2428383995046249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}