{"id":"W2142556411","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00305.x","title":"A critical analysis of the ubiquity of linear local–regional richness relationships","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Species richness; Metacommunity; Ecology; Inference; Diversity (politics); Geography; Argument (complex analysis); Economic geography; Biology; Sociology; Computer science; Biological dispersal","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1590793,0.001192155,0.002307008,0.02110565,0.002108437,0.006359134,0.002803126,0.002004225,0.01291061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5575776,0.0007743568,0.002938611,0.01087881,0.007074519,0.009343877,0.004441018,0.002772688,0.0006342808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005123877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003220507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002774819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002431422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.872165,0.07423874,0.0192514,0.0158234,0.01709008,0.001431339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2402346,0.6407173,0.05081287,0.0312695,0.03574043,0.001225263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002706461,0.00007371658,0.151742,0.1475406,0.01723123,0.002449091,0.03784499,0.004412991,0.004074773,0.2315554,0.05476514,0.3456036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004326342,0.001003313,0.1700286,0.08185497,0.02304144,0.003425502,0.02942988,0.01156363,0.008352371,0.357893,0.3125135,0.0004610229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2726254,0.2786326,0.2485635,0.1068552,0.01163165,0.004613697,0.01650763,0.001257132,0.05931313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438357,0.007076462,0.03456804,0.008254677,0.00193753,0.001874654,0.0007505781,0.0002374819,0.001464904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1590793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8413019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.021371227980425,"score_gpt":0.2642096274850499,"score_spread":0.2428383995046249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}