{"id":"W2142627948","doi":"10.1071/zo10034","title":"Positive and negative effects of phoretic mites on the reproductive output of an invasive bark beetle","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"Australian Research Council; University of Melbourne; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Biology; Mite; Bark beetle; Acari; Host (biology); Zoology; Offspring; Bark (sound); Acariformes; Larva; Reproduction; Ecology; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004058505,0.00009119313,0.0002089135,0.00005276623,0.00005009883,0.000003473094,0.0002052673,0.000075921,0.0003506812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006096803,0.00006038569,0.00004827331,0.0000927861,0.001119244,0.000108118,0.00006655202,0.0003006436,0.00001181401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001753217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001306151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001196076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002315416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991632,0.0002017401,0.0002374085,0.0001497842,0.000110754,0.0001371156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987571,0.0006002949,0.0003735435,0.0001771196,0.000035023,0.00005690522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001359632,0.001166335,0.1770118,0.0001061431,0.0007401952,0.0004658721,0.02296772,0.0006144261,0.7674059,0.01586409,0.006353776,0.00594416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003194201,0.002309626,0.7646461,0.00002185932,0.00005723094,0.00009705254,0.0006323677,0.000002133503,0.2226672,0.009170601,0.00002445281,0.0000519543],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979045,0.000008649594,0.000004195555,0.0009706212,0.0002676663,0.0001876771,0.000002979359,0.00000143584,0.0006523214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990674,0.00001175014,0.0004864362,0.0001815499,0.00003709126,0.00000274471,4.467836e-7,0.000004862728,0.000207665],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5876343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4123902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007582314242996806,"score_gpt":0.2221291350714958,"score_spread":0.214546820828499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}