{"id":"W2142640059","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2001.017","title":"Assessment of the Effects of Endocrine Disrupting Substances in the Canadian Environment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Effluent; Endocrine disruptor; Endocrine system; Environmental planning; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Biochemical engineering; Business; Waste management; Engineering; Chemistry; Hormone","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006922395,0.0004415386,0.0002660146,0.001805728,0.00285622,0.001244892,0.000632029,0.0003471349,0.002553435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001205366,0.0001538043,0.000310617,0.002010013,0.0006120854,0.0003140928,0.0005720905,0.0003617569,0.000197535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02515726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02996801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983589,0.0001260615,0.00003060805,0.00008029845,0.001219788,0.0001843712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989453,0.00004649302,0.00005543353,0.000009801222,0.0008577922,0.0000852162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001104951,0.0003576676,0.5915187,0.001505638,0.0003755257,0.001363439,0.001986734,0.01411216,0.1178024,0.006843464,0.01499981,0.2480295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004667031,0.0007333387,0.8502431,0.0001498958,0.0002612805,0.0003800741,0.004886364,0.0074632,0.04481128,0.001349553,0.08957534,0.0001000124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8969242,0.004267403,0.003451614,0.002076289,0.00008787835,0.0003891619,0.004445333,0.0001199481,0.08823825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697744,0.004025082,0.004513705,0.0002539271,0.0000107497,0.00003730667,0.001011218,0.00001654806,0.02035701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02515726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1825295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04634551215816429,"score_gpt":0.4415143184582924,"score_spread":0.3951688063001281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}