{"id":"W2142677209","doi":"10.1109/tbc.2010.2086750","title":"Study of Rating Scales for Subjective Quality Assessment of High-Definition Video","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting","topic":"Image and Video Quality Assessment","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Communications Research Centre Canada","funders":"National Telecommunications and Information Administration","keywords":"Subjective video quality; Computer science; Video quality; Standardization; Quality (philosophy); Rating scale; Context (archaeology); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Image quality; Statistics; Metric (unit); Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001282382,0.0001687324,0.0003610231,0.0001885151,0.0002956473,0.00006172644,0.0003490462,0.00007096296,0.000007947841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006409991,0.0001696059,0.0001365536,0.0003724815,0.0000596622,0.0004831012,0.000006661407,0.0003355568,0.000001016448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004529307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001157857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005632266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000491525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979113,0.0002484598,0.0007524888,0.0004095999,0.0004475345,0.0002305834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973245,0.00128287,0.0004510747,0.0005112941,0.0003756808,0.00005459102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002180601,0.01232284,0.002721169,0.0007382697,0.000517575,0.000009563732,0.01679391,0.02605098,0.5112444,0.04094644,0.00002519323,0.3884116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008693529,0.005894174,0.09254475,0.0003699898,0.0002330323,0.00002800781,0.01305977,0.1086198,0.7607036,0.008633768,0.00001701202,0.001202613],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4522878,0.000001454671,0.546747,0.00004360227,0.0003662137,0.000357564,0.00001738443,0.00004376744,0.0001352521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8682975,8.659705e-7,0.1315067,0.00002619131,0.00003555325,0.0001101434,0.000001501023,0.00001107826,0.00001053226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4160097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6916327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09134018622709314,"score_gpt":0.3760995127797918,"score_spread":0.2847593265526986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}