{"id":"W2142708001","doi":"10.1118/1.2335490","title":"Evaluation of two methods of predicting MLC leaf positions using EPID measurements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Cancer Research","keywords":"Multileaf collimator; Calibration; Position (finance); Extrapolation; Collimator; Collimated light; Image-guided radiation therapy; Mathematics; Interpolation (computer graphics); Optics; Computer science; Beam (structure); Physics; Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Linear particle accelerator; Medical imaging; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001651537,0.00009906528,0.0002216025,0.0000290706,0.00005344482,0.00000361091,0.0001176058,0.00003243193,0.0001647105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004702316,0.00009506289,0.00009116506,0.0001799926,0.0001094396,0.0001048152,0.00002547299,0.0001233025,2.451765e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006522582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000157432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003538713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001493232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980792,0.0002683771,0.0003456088,0.0001392524,0.001028588,0.0001390104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990705,0.00009461633,0.000252509,0.0001866739,0.0003532651,0.00004247082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001122346,0.0009500835,0.08557846,0.0000419375,0.0003020707,2.195948e-7,0.0002213432,0.0082186,0.2450759,0.007141161,0.0001545006,0.6523045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009503771,0.00004679497,0.0009185806,0.0001532038,0.0002547246,4.23485e-7,0.00001586971,0.06066417,0.8055887,0.1312421,0.00003226458,0.0001328681],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09106515,0.00009452009,0.9049739,0.0000186427,0.00006547001,0.0001807136,0.00001272572,0.00002467854,0.003564218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8781219,7.179522e-7,0.1214098,0.00001101761,0.0004028904,0.0000142575,0.0000195905,0.00001496805,0.000004838882],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7870568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3876552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09162460876806418,"score_gpt":0.4433520944909106,"score_spread":0.3517274857228464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}