{"id":"W2142744427","doi":"10.1162/rest.89.2.300","title":"Do Peers Affect Student Achievement in China's Secondary Schools?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Desegregation; Affect (linguistics); Tracking (education); Voucher; China; Academic achievement; Student achievement; Peer effects; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Selection bias; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Econometrics; Computer science; Pedagogy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003469107,0.00007455247,0.0002168165,0.00003137007,0.0001302892,0.00003527598,0.0001909852,0.00002593474,0.00008985932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009952297,0.00005631206,0.00002893919,0.0000747528,0.00009094947,0.00007832461,0.00004020165,0.0001678588,0.000009794576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006076303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001134875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004193933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003328368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992362,0.00007324858,0.0003279159,0.0001066119,0.00007581992,0.0001801981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994309,0.0001874678,0.0001499372,0.0001429022,0.0000251632,0.00006363307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003492617,0.0001411325,0.08778501,0.002329977,0.00007520831,0.00000457227,0.0058251,0.00004671353,0.000002145249,0.4687946,0.007581883,0.4273787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005499097,0.0001426481,0.6777608,0.001613342,0.00006628504,0.000001763453,0.003266849,0.00007319662,0.000009464928,0.009270745,0.3069587,0.0002862916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.9130839,0.06330352,0.0003504241,0.003723406,0.0003532017,0.0007213299,0.0001181374,0.000007221665,0.01833888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3354248,0.6620694,0.001430659,0.0007477301,0.0001416194,0.000006817329,0.00000843892,0.00000668263,0.0001638837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5987659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2296339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02103848834825416,"score_gpt":0.3443849803235342,"score_spread":0.32334649197528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}