{"id":"W2142763255","doi":"10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04002.x","title":"Can models of presence‐absence be used to scale abundance? Two case studies considering extremes in life history","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; University of Northern British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Environment; Sand County Foundation","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Bracken; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Biology; Fern; Relative abundance distribution","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000233535,0.0001237965,0.0002321469,0.0001150709,0.00009108447,0.000003583579,0.0001179482,0.00003368043,0.0001227375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007809794,0.0001258366,0.00005908993,0.000267775,0.000514208,0.0002047429,0.0001475995,0.00009204551,0.00001108436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001498856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001648294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006069482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1146496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990093,0.00005240265,0.0002775223,0.0002842872,0.0001366306,0.0002398763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994352,0.0002010566,0.00008758665,0.0001749397,0.0000176465,0.00008360759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001671769,0.0001301661,0.8093534,0.00002504501,0.00006062431,0.00008987491,0.03811292,0.1477412,0.000768184,0.0003939068,0.002583559,0.0007244468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006092501,0.0007469734,0.7245289,0.000441591,0.0002068555,0.0003788621,0.0325776,0.1835583,0.003104148,0.03466788,0.0105333,0.003163077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953608,0.001214436,0.0001142364,0.001108008,0.0001514319,0.0001974572,0.000006585206,0.00002490704,0.001822144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953417,0.000124098,0.003801336,0.0005050192,0.00001498899,0.0000551539,5.580367e-7,0.000007393392,0.0001498223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1140427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9015057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05430032889106406,"score_gpt":0.2777203349219189,"score_spread":0.2234200060308548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}