{"id":"W2142892303","doi":"10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3f.1171","title":"Creating Comparability among Reliability Coefficients: The Case of Cronbach Alpha and Cohen Kappa","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Reports","topic":"Reliability and Agreement in Measurement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Comparability; Kappa; Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Alpha (finance); Estimator; Statistics; Metric (unit); Cohen's kappa; Contrast (vision); Complement (music); Psychometrics; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Chemistry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2893915,0.001940116,0.0026171,0.01343988,0.00242077,0.008759093,0.003955299,0.002650175,0.002251213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6922681,0.001496713,0.001864432,0.01025729,0.01029712,0.01249362,0.007947391,0.005799122,0.001023831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002995654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004985053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002260406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002035672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5901139,0.2814668,0.03061114,0.031042,0.06435286,0.002413269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3095525,0.5167066,0.03425601,0.07215506,0.06552055,0.001809307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008562023,0.0001674794,0.07863238,0.00368424,0.004034626,0.0005735213,0.02429599,0.005090767,0.004601373,0.2869406,0.01468066,0.5764422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002512812,0.001267899,0.08909812,0.004478869,0.001817936,0.001909555,0.01403639,0.03601953,0.01323705,0.7534858,0.08356907,0.0008284727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.06320585,0.004951853,0.8967443,0.002308967,0.001897838,0.001583619,0.0006063784,0.001030379,0.02767086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4778067,0.001170417,0.5149935,0.0006408839,0.0007666002,0.00222601,0.0004242187,0.0005149256,0.001456862],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7106085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8763068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.123497322714613,"score_gpt":0.4136398494609489,"score_spread":0.2901425267463359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}