{"id":"W2142956613","doi":"10.1080/19440049.2012.712063","title":"Evaluation of variability and quality control procedures for a receptor-binding assay for paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Food Additives & Contaminants Part A","topic":"Marine Toxins and Detection Methods","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Outlier; Calibration; Detector; Paralytic shellfish poisoning; Statistics; Computer science; False positive paradox; Mathematics; Biology; Shellfish; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":0,"stratum":"fund_new","weight":1678.9,"opus":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"medium","reason":"Single-laboratory evaluation of variability and quality control procedures for a receptor-binding assay for shellfish toxins; this is analytical assay validation and laboratory QC, the polysemy trap the rubric places OUT, not a study of research practice."},"gpt":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"The work evaluates quality control for a specific laboratory assay, not research practice as a social or methodological system."},"grok":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Single-lab evaluation of assay variability for shellfish toxin detection; food-safety method QC, not metaresearch."}},"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04573718,0.001236192,0.001455761,0.002430591,0.001429883,0.002235799,0.002406947,0.001701312,0.001241359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0583034,0.0008973637,0.001889782,0.002654693,0.002038161,0.0006591342,0.001297284,0.001685493,0.0007620324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001172397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001914516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003140935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003472614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9181733,0.01986782,0.006931071,0.007455375,0.04677763,0.0007948365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9464127,0.01906503,0.006356335,0.008785895,0.01892911,0.0004508232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002879598,0.001807414,0.05602807,0.001539632,0.001098821,0.0004889576,0.00361892,0.007479215,0.7882997,0.002206116,0.00196671,0.1325868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002031379,0.008601851,0.08880423,0.0003626484,0.001355037,0.001918145,0.0006432104,0.03737936,0.8433587,0.001105024,0.01588703,0.0003816226],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4310026,0.004199163,0.550973,0.000405599,0.001004499,0.004786055,0.001418178,0.002368478,0.003842416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5186468,0.001787395,0.4657536,0.0004577454,0.00023647,0.005510545,0.00353027,0.0007575768,0.003319535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04573718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05537196407374013,"score_gpt":0.3406554937629258,"score_spread":0.2852835296891857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}