{"id":"W2142963442","doi":"10.1177/0165551508100383","title":"An empirical comparison of ontology matching techniques","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Science","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministry of Education, Libya","keywords":"Computer science; Matching (statistics); Ontology alignment; Ontology; Task (project management); Process (computing); Feature (linguistics); Data mining; Quality (philosophy); Feature matching; Information retrieval; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Feature extraction; Semantic Web; Ontology-based data integration; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001451621,0.00005409376,0.0001879451,0.0004477717,0.00009266254,0.0001566778,0.00135179,0.00003576707,0.000002153166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001981251,0.00003855444,0.00003882999,0.0005678578,0.0001377328,0.008315744,0.00004521216,0.0001246077,0.000002978228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003609174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002336372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005031074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001296713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985674,0.00002745635,0.0006545049,0.00005513514,0.0005535685,0.0001419326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984517,0.00005230493,0.0007049397,0.0002113413,0.0005067006,0.00007308475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003422128,0.0002129324,0.01868225,0.0000151192,0.000005296664,0.000005278776,0.03195551,0.000907039,0.0199926,0.08225232,0.0009848861,0.8449525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000649322,0.004058165,0.554788,0.0001453124,0.00001225771,0.0009050221,0.005947651,0.1081623,0.278872,0.04161725,0.004450086,0.0003925671],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3248014,0.00001775944,0.6717795,0.001141381,0.0001552568,0.00002856337,1.068953e-7,0.00002678351,0.002049212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8043671,0.000004536511,0.195105,0.0005074263,0.000014692,1.166984e-7,6.122494e-8,3.156943e-7,6.664959e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6028714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03618679243024425,"score_gpt":0.3907106206773219,"score_spread":0.3545238282470777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}