{"id":"W2142969491","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01253.x","title":"Utility of Measuring Abundance versus Consistent Occupancy in Predicting Biodiversity Persistence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Occupancy; Abundance (ecology); Persistence (discontinuity); Biodiversity; Ecology; Complementarity (molecular biology); Environmental science; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001972792,0.00007056123,0.0001214213,0.00002476778,0.0000703613,0.000004529272,0.0001265878,0.0000660777,0.003844502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001927021,0.00007288533,0.0000394399,0.0002122116,0.0002489258,0.00008325209,0.00005466612,0.00006377192,0.00007524797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001388131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000119391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003998658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000838071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993008,0.00005755263,0.0001933243,0.0002040628,0.00008253012,0.0001617731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996341,0.00006261356,0.0001065881,0.0001363481,0.00002402806,0.00003627912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009872243,0.00004715921,0.9932896,0.000003514475,0.000002552881,7.545169e-7,0.0001256434,0.000001671175,0.004647272,0.000283029,0.0004756979,0.0010244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005613115,0.00007365242,0.994495,0.000006630359,0.000004583396,9.676901e-7,0.0006769564,0.0002297335,0.001633498,0.00005809176,0.002192542,0.0000670609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879845,0.00005880005,0.00004714061,0.001073384,0.0001376813,0.0000970825,0.00004684475,0.00002436733,0.01053016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995078,0.00003078077,0.00005879589,0.0003477975,0.000003837247,0.000001613958,0.00003490293,7.914473e-7,0.00001368283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01152326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1310931160470315,"score_gpt":0.2711297204460321,"score_spread":0.1400366043990006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}