{"id":"W2142978025","doi":"10.1145/1858996.1859015","title":"Deviance from perfection is a better criterion than closeness to evil when identifying risky code","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Perfection; Code (set theory); Computer science; Closeness; Detector; Normality; Deviance (statistics); Measure (data warehouse); Set (abstract data type); Robustness (evolution); Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Theoretical computer science; Computer security; Machine learning; Programming language; Data mining; Mathematics; Statistics; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007900595,0.0009159964,0.001296027,0.00638334,0.0008850431,0.002696024,0.000945039,0.001635008,0.001277827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06458483,0.000383389,0.0008781528,0.002126357,0.003302019,0.003422808,0.002276445,0.002554116,0.0004130018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007891666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009479406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001173663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001624426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915834,0.002176017,0.0008832256,0.001566766,0.003350306,0.0004403364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8978897,0.06538336,0.01676421,0.00871353,0.008368377,0.002880859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001117087,0.0006134373,0.5599782,0.0004675142,0.0006478135,0.0005774213,0.002242752,0.1302256,0.02516838,0.03138869,0.002175855,0.2453972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001270745,0.002721937,0.2454555,0.0001897528,0.000217833,0.001873456,0.001271665,0.6063559,0.04489369,0.09185719,0.004466389,0.0005694863],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7322044,0.0002507708,0.2613814,0.0005077394,0.0000478561,0.0001286942,0.0003548937,0.0009280869,0.004196183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957006,0.00003534367,0.04223806,0.0000491127,0.00001586859,0.00004681882,0.0001866663,0.00006688385,0.0003552244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007900595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04178286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02695663459996754,"score_gpt":0.2989857409719689,"score_spread":0.2720291063720013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}