{"id":"W2143104478","doi":"10.1177/0731684409352124","title":"Buckling Analysis of Tapered Composite Beams using a Higher Order Finite Element Formulation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Materials science; Buckling; Classification of discontinuities; Composite laminates; Structural engineering; Stiffness; Composite number; Parametric statistics; Beam (structure); Stress (linguistics); Composite material; Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002175737,0.0002884293,0.000320554,0.0004256307,0.000201798,0.0003164713,0.000403414,0.0005738231,0.001309907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000368847,0.0002061375,0.0004454906,0.0001938968,0.000310697,0.0002926778,0.0002628471,0.0003377689,0.000192516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003146995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000459128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003680131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003982007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999127,0.00001757751,0.000004248021,0.000008497367,0.00004718881,0.000009645579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999822,0.00007644078,0.00002764992,0.00001712241,0.00004714664,0.000009663375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003010578,0.00002994005,0.0004483872,0.00003931273,0.00001152732,0.00008235349,0.0000684667,0.9614723,0.02660811,0.003910524,0.0001018592,0.007197146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001365955,0.000008935453,0.0001252653,0.000001644892,0.000001163785,0.000007671633,0.000005290457,0.9985828,0.0009542997,0.0001913511,0.0001183492,0.000001791328],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2886515,0.0002310201,0.6997883,0.00008407811,0.00002157802,0.00004654362,0.00008705044,0.0002054655,0.01088435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9101793,0.0002027396,0.08214119,0.00003735763,0.00001092431,0.00007344611,0.00009122203,0.00004292016,0.007220862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003680131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007317424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005647025722154517,"score_gpt":0.2102391693320532,"score_spread":0.2045921436098987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}