{"id":"W2143104478","doi":"10.1177/0731684409352124","title":"Buckling Analysis of Tapered Composite Beams using a Higher Order Finite Element Formulation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Materials science; Buckling; Classification of discontinuities; Composite laminates; Structural engineering; Stiffness; Composite number; Parametric statistics; Beam (structure); Stress (linguistics); Composite material; Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001165372,0.0001555566,0.0004444233,0.0005743047,0.00007798861,0.00007605708,0.0001016851,0.00008271104,0.00006420252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001769602,0.0001328796,0.0001677583,0.0006789659,0.00002308865,0.0001713712,0.0000265505,0.000219753,1.985544e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002290165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001423762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001178575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000105463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988542,0.00001054509,0.0006756812,0.0000790495,0.0002439099,0.0001366156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988995,0.0001801162,0.0003545523,0.0001151049,0.0003670216,0.00008366445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002790589,0.000004791334,0.003242444,0.00002087261,0.0008502182,0.00000148812,0.00009857069,0.7649981,0.2300819,0.0003807473,0.000004523728,0.0002884484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003797516,0.00007790704,0.005132007,0.00003621932,0.001709641,0.000006901413,0.00001561296,0.9779443,0.01437047,0.0000261753,0.0001629468,0.0001380449],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7118368,0.0001029022,0.2877061,0.000007746836,0.0001910853,0.00003754052,0.000008263778,0.000009987745,0.00009955945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565007,0.00006511703,0.04327389,0.00001390562,0.00008650662,2.744069e-7,0.00003470464,0.00001318907,0.00001168225],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.244664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5418671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005647025722154517,"score_gpt":0.2102391693320532,"score_spread":0.2045921436098987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}