{"id":"W2143152504","doi":"10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00029.x","title":"A Comparative Study of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Mandibular Canals and Cross‐Sectional Areas in Diagnosis prior to Dental Implant Treatment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","topic":"Dental Radiography and Imaging","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Molar; Medicine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Computed tomography; Mandibular canal; Implant; Dentistry; Tomography; Dental implant; Mandibular molar; Mandible (arthropod mouthpart); Cohen's kappa; Orthodontics; Radiology; Nuclear medicine; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006614857,0.0005218374,0.000402221,0.002417759,0.0002650913,0.0005952105,0.0003702881,0.0006196978,0.0007960458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03101626,0.0005405093,0.0004324556,0.0009000135,0.0005505647,0.0009717085,0.0005405281,0.0003467352,0.0002235399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003051964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004626313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001076733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001900114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968965,0.001375597,0.0003113369,0.0003565737,0.0008953553,0.0001645869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816455,0.01160365,0.002677433,0.0005665441,0.002747913,0.0007589934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002637834,0.0002045014,0.9723629,0.0001023666,0.0001346741,0.0005410109,0.0008908804,0.0001501482,0.0037374,0.00003817714,0.00005978197,0.01914029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008679223,0.00330205,0.9903284,0.00003475474,0.0001617913,0.002615844,0.000780221,0.001119646,0.001155198,0.00003017774,0.0003623845,0.00002273993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984793,0.0005826049,0.0004318404,0.0000157935,0.000009596068,0.00003271432,0.00002942917,0.000006264011,0.0004124137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998816,0.0001813408,0.0008487951,0.00001045002,0.00001969961,0.00001900385,0.00004429104,0.000003277594,0.00005712423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006614857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03498316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07489795926598057,"score_gpt":0.4316083681838852,"score_spread":0.3567104089179046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}