{"id":"W2143207779","doi":"10.1139/cjz-2015-0073","title":"Fluctuating asymmetry in an extreme morphological adaptation in the Chilean bee <i>Xeromelissa rozeni</i> (Hymenoptera: Colletidae)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Morphological variations and asymmetry","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fluctuating asymmetry; Biology; Zoology; Evolutionary biology; Natural selection; Bilateral symmetry; Conservation biology; Adaptation (eye); Loss of heterozygosity; Haplodiploidy; Ecology; Genetics; Allele; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ploidy; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002520386,0.0001602214,0.0004013729,0.0005054693,0.00008770207,0.00006154562,0.0004905261,0.0002140916,0.0002102028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001860933,0.0001124323,0.00006735458,0.0005786832,0.0001095101,0.0001759466,0.00001918931,0.0006384628,0.00001193649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002231858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005104017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001957298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0478939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976788,0.000728345,0.0007629797,0.0001872357,0.0002212418,0.0004213874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983963,0.0005116159,0.0003361396,0.0001936134,0.0001714657,0.0003908858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003223743,0.001447013,0.7188845,0.00005998341,0.0001348242,0.01788575,0.02755055,0.003944763,0.001723281,0.1687963,0.02747783,0.0317729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00677747,0.003526902,0.7621866,0.0001852841,0.0001148541,0.004958259,0.0306412,0.003865288,0.00007703323,0.1836521,0.003118604,0.0008963912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923344,0.0002279224,0.002448417,0.001872634,0.000226359,0.0001873111,0.00001029238,0.000006025354,0.002686678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983615,0.000003957477,0.01506693,0.001072181,0.0001834672,0.00000720369,0.000006584024,0.000013103,0.00003157794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04593661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9694796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1130430160418626,"score_gpt":0.2902675078808405,"score_spread":0.177224491838978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}