{"id":"W2143232633","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2004.1347694","title":"An adaptive algorithm for efficient electromagnetic field calculations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Method of moments (probability theory); Electromagnetic field; Algorithm; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Computational complexity theory; Computational electromagnetics; Scale (ratio); Scattering; Computational science; Mathematics; Physics; Optics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003823531,0.0004519523,0.0004235771,0.0004069597,0.0004319948,0.0006015351,0.001191506,0.0007083727,0.006483396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002143234,0.00024951,0.000313071,0.0007251301,0.0003905162,0.0007631123,0.0009075454,0.001027326,0.002080044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000239648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005433713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001063991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001126335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996582,0.0000780564,0.0000171882,0.00004676232,0.000175653,0.00002418365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999483,0.0001977265,0.00002885172,0.00007548076,0.0001896768,0.0000252395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001565034,0.00008140613,0.0007446785,0.0001278536,0.00004049679,0.0001817577,0.0001247628,0.2815903,0.02669458,0.08933932,0.01666665,0.5842516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001712033,0.00002702725,0.0001007843,0.000007685648,0.000005413327,0.00007837432,0.000008315803,0.9727368,0.003101203,0.009388115,0.01452056,0.000008675042],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001734972,0.00007485202,0.9954439,0.00004723114,0.00005222877,0.00002069309,0.00001888623,0.0005003824,0.002106803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04390942,0.0001962369,0.9499685,0.0000924796,0.0000529349,0.000201756,0.0001352091,0.0001966322,0.005246916],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006483396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02168918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006284218588215072,"score_gpt":0.2472900782432197,"score_spread":0.2410058596550047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}