{"id":"W2143234838","doi":"10.1109/tmtt.2002.805131","title":"Feasible adjoint sensitivity technique for EM design optimization","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensitivity (control systems); Adjoint equation; Nonlinear system; Overhead (engineering); Computer science; Frequency domain; Electronic engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Engineering; Physics; Partial differential equation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001411016,0.00111488,0.0006705003,0.000849032,0.0003485041,0.0007677484,0.0005439692,0.0007894145,0.002870422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002980929,0.0004914114,0.0008100229,0.0005025934,0.0008118926,0.000778508,0.001088688,0.001244995,0.0006200286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004201588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005431227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003833505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002817487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992703,0.0003410944,0.00001957841,0.00004956473,0.0002899591,0.00002956043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990746,0.0006154561,0.00006309929,0.0000980546,0.0001305577,0.00001817715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006724101,0.00005405219,0.0002576714,0.0001583858,0.00005676908,0.0001155839,0.00009225707,0.769423,0.02388214,0.1339072,0.00139995,0.07058576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005532249,0.00002816566,0.00004960853,0.00001008379,0.000006058617,0.00003505695,0.000004876385,0.9744899,0.003077468,0.02050371,0.001780322,0.000009155623],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001140568,0.00003886387,0.997682,0.00002896936,0.00001042578,0.00001086415,0.000007610333,0.00009075796,0.0009898818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2879161,0.0003467442,0.7066743,0.0001603845,0.00006370262,0.0003714133,0.0001161461,0.0002339294,0.004117293],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002870422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009602487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01530245320209033,"score_gpt":0.2321793750069427,"score_spread":0.2168769218048524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}