{"id":"W2143262688","doi":"10.1017/s0008423910000764","title":"Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation at the Supreme Court of Canada: Quebec<i>Secession Reference</i>and Beyond","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Secession; Law; Politics; Humanities; History; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001708123,0.0001663703,0.0002660567,0.001280801,0.01550185,0.007999781,0.001095336,0.001543671,0.007052944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006029977,0.0001820369,0.0002444201,0.002135928,0.00943371,0.001655117,0.00211816,0.002076927,0.0001846113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1160232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1155506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976791,0.0003180308,0.00003692669,0.0002590557,0.0006525238,0.001054523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948438,0.001056377,0.0004821224,0.000192902,0.0022751,0.001149615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008691029,0.0000826511,0.1192877,0.00009571106,0.00005086866,0.002694415,0.1043459,0.00201298,0.002586013,0.6935857,0.02363146,0.05153967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005086016,0.0001135357,0.4316315,0.0004808687,0.0001262792,0.0005466642,0.223752,0.006967481,0.002397895,0.05882583,0.2748207,0.0002864126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7607083,0.0006835733,0.001574562,0.01509721,0.00007938347,0.00005717706,0.0002220855,0.00003498171,0.2215427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932156,0.00009050818,0.000163562,0.0002717498,0.000004267118,0.000003615152,0.00002267152,0.00000347885,0.006224483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1160232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8418111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03314748148262044,"score_gpt":0.2890302107596631,"score_spread":0.2558827292770427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}