{"id":"W2143358109","doi":"10.1139/f08-028","title":"A two-stage biomass random effects model for stock assessment without catches: What can be estimated using only biomass survey indices?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Stock assessment; Anchovy; Log-normal distribution; Statistics; Engraulis; Stock (firearms); Random effects model; Biomass (ecology); Mathematics; Fish stock; Environmental science; Population; Fishery; Econometrics; Ecology; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geography; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01077679,0.001814157,0.002206308,0.0009809209,0.0003891968,0.001644679,0.004694485,0.002430079,0.004621696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02270784,0.001378455,0.0020578,0.001410191,0.001141621,0.004106324,0.001246843,0.001992787,0.001361997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001491733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001390998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01623473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01417739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979849,0.001091212,0.0001118428,0.0004208675,0.0002274291,0.0001637656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905967,0.006956214,0.0008964964,0.0006528797,0.0006464763,0.0002511744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002422363,0.0001600704,0.01253133,0.0004458426,0.0005262485,0.0002100277,0.0002671834,0.880246,0.0015222,0.04697123,0.002360236,0.05451741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003953519,0.0000878326,0.00173891,0.00005834147,0.00009949094,0.00007298006,0.00002018336,0.9758356,0.0001651928,0.02072458,0.001092318,0.00006491717],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02390823,0.0003494953,0.9730962,0.0005746144,0.0001022747,0.000137834,0.0005062316,0.0004230558,0.0009020977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4925497,0.001940278,0.485687,0.000703247,0.0002716313,0.001671278,0.002011923,0.0005041683,0.01466063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01623473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05699378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08815180912371566,"score_gpt":0.3207297006822775,"score_spread":0.2325778915585618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}