{"id":"W2143457017","doi":"10.1177/0272989x07300604","title":"A Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utilities","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Decision Making","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Prostate cancer; Affect (linguistics); Quality of life (healthcare); Variance (accounting); Medicine; Actuarial science; Cancer; Computer science; Psychology; Accounting; Nursing; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03519491,0.003753496,0.01889156,0.01443324,0.00064105,0.004280895,0.002124632,0.00186756,0.003382253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09868644,0.001565093,0.0528166,0.01284112,0.0007531676,0.002125564,0.001903783,0.002291126,0.0003138791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004653438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004418678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006492903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008635266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9651794,0.02300685,0.006187206,0.002112967,0.003012236,0.0005014294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9358964,0.05355005,0.005736826,0.001622796,0.0029113,0.0002825609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001610422,0.0000267909,0.003750412,0.2714099,0.6897769,0.0001115543,0.00006188062,0.001580228,0.0001007577,0.0003954082,0.001329628,0.02984607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005969164,0.0002285492,0.004345172,0.03363645,0.9561281,0.0001839678,0.00004363318,0.0005181425,0.0001284248,0.0008889632,0.003263879,0.00003776429],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002618233,0.9939228,0.001414379,0.0002893259,0.0001782793,0.0002791832,0.000910945,0.00003872552,0.0003481649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1473982,0.8425065,0.005154646,0.0008632046,0.0003569426,0.001795888,0.001584324,0.00006107814,0.0002791731],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03519491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1861306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7527892240790977,"score_gpt":0.6008747232664101,"score_spread":0.1519145008126875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}