{"id":"W2143663865","doi":"10.1177/09500170122119138","title":"The Vertical Dimension of Occupational Segregation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Work Employment and Society","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Disadvantage; Dimension (graph theory); Social stratification; Demographic economics; Occupational segregation; Argument (complex analysis); Stratification (seeds); Horizontal and vertical; Social inequality; Sociology; Labour economics; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Social science; Geometry; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004168606,0.00006043821,0.00008409554,0.000007518955,0.001179966,0.00003833231,0.00006182907,0.00005469478,0.00003951266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006842268,0.00004190244,0.00007387353,0.0002106474,0.0003733732,0.00007844214,0.00003054584,0.00005546915,0.000005197229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003712095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004451476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001256845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000143633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991695,0.00007038796,0.0001505047,0.0001074505,0.0003430881,0.0001591205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993978,0.0003460768,0.00003896515,0.00007080186,0.00009833553,0.00004804823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009933947,0.0000901047,0.7471254,0.000004304979,0.0001133555,4.449263e-7,0.05473372,0.000009074849,0.00005345584,0.1427515,0.03931261,0.01570662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007231568,0.00007316827,0.7048923,0.00003840013,0.00005950988,4.433125e-7,0.0196658,0.0002626377,0.00008996791,0.005792996,0.2681751,0.0002265508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887176,0.000802217,0.0003949466,0.003739978,0.0002271497,0.0001752064,0.000001251373,0.00003988239,0.005901757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946423,0.001633393,0.0001447733,0.0001896639,0.0001062603,0.000009699726,0.000003460364,0.000003642199,0.003266763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2288625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9075465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04220425004455691,"score_gpt":0.3177548258929245,"score_spread":0.2755505758483676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}