{"id":"W2143679364","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.035","title":"Topographic screening of donor eyes for previous refractive surgery","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","topic":"Corneal surgery and disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Radial keratotomy; Keratomileusis; Photorefractive keratectomy; Refractive surgery; Ophthalmology; Medicine; Receiver operating characteristic; Mean difference; Corneal topography; Refractive error; Optometry; Significant difference; Cornea; Vision disorder; Curvature; Eye disease; Mathematics; Confidence interval; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002513928,0.0003730043,0.001815918,0.001247437,0.000148326,0.00003527072,0.0001253434,0.0002235392,0.0001112414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002417326,0.0003117179,0.001970031,0.0007746563,0.0001883677,0.0009547583,0.00003209089,0.0006038644,0.000004001989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001142707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007775709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004196289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000283635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963642,0.0002128343,0.001824891,0.0003397252,0.0007138662,0.0005444212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863227,0.008889023,0.002810775,0.000367263,0.001352456,0.0002577697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01805045,0.002431872,0.7924141,0.0006701295,0.001410903,0.0005758285,0.0002105813,0.00008056939,0.009037887,0.000086811,0.03613059,0.1389002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001545266,0.0006051812,0.8659151,0.001589455,0.0009913435,0.0008063887,0.0007580093,0.00003241751,0.02154358,0.000976351,0.1046123,0.0006246264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898831,0.00464483,0.00218077,0.0011945,0.000745564,0.0004257161,0.00005731679,0.00002853305,0.0008397134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965624,0.001225177,0.0006451086,0.0003092342,0.000856238,0.00002038844,0.00009686212,0.00005865189,0.0002259037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1382756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02708333102300935,"score_gpt":0.2862443485429625,"score_spread":0.2591610175199532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}