{"id":"W2143728095","doi":"10.1017/s1358246111000257","title":"Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature and Environmentalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Environmentalism; Natural (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Value (mathematics); Aside; Aesthetics; Nature Conservation; Environmental policy; Set (abstract data type); State of nature; Political science; Sociology; Law; History; Philosophy; Geography; Politics; Environmental planning; Ecology; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002211205,0.0002269235,0.0002656547,0.0005656217,0.002747003,0.004116911,0.0003976619,0.002052939,0.003448509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001812586,0.0001237518,0.0002619255,0.0004930604,0.03189591,0.004344983,0.003105409,0.004527394,0.0004008724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003246695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001238469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001950209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975384,0.001503756,0.00004447605,0.0001875321,0.0005143122,0.0002115126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991671,0.0004382606,0.00007360526,0.0001097547,0.0001176642,0.00009364738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002915395,0.000007812686,0.0000775703,0.00001626864,0.000001418693,0.00001850347,0.002029824,0.00006536224,0.00006748358,0.9908337,0.003735329,0.003143732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003939486,0.00001095071,0.0004478372,0.00005090231,0.000001461088,0.00008208735,0.001756827,0.000145226,0.00005437116,0.8318483,0.1655924,0.00000567154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0260673,0.01913348,0.005849303,0.08386422,0.001648161,0.00001301288,0.00002230935,0.00002857219,0.8633736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9012383,0.00881517,0.002667909,0.01919227,0.001761538,0.00003904582,0.00002535292,0.00005621188,0.06620423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004116911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02355653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02054419610536003,"score_gpt":0.2243574687599595,"score_spread":0.2038132726545995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}