{"id":"W2143986371","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00895.x","title":"Assessing the Ecological and Social Benefits of Private Land Conservation in Colorado","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Business; Incentive; Jurisdiction; Land use; Environmental planning; Land tenure; Environmental resource management; Riparian zone; Government (linguistics); Land management; Geography; Zoning; Cadastre; Agriculture; Habitat; Ecology; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001199377,0.0001634089,0.0002314579,0.001449008,0.003412403,0.001255959,0.0006953683,0.0004830921,0.001589292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004016576,0.0001999669,0.0001204142,0.001610249,0.001241865,0.0007178225,0.001539154,0.0004930259,0.00009772911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008539234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003288538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7967331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998768,0.0003470179,0.00004871516,0.0001842862,0.0003116799,0.000340261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946233,0.0008308663,0.001000714,0.0002104778,0.002274203,0.001060421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116308,0.0003315659,0.9648237,0.00007577668,0.00005850879,0.0003700568,0.00907781,0.001185986,0.001659593,0.001095579,0.002175025,0.01903012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008469355,0.0001641205,0.976213,0.00004467923,0.00002636563,0.0001059031,0.01594554,0.001125175,0.0003474967,0.0002041208,0.005804024,0.00001113378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952456,0.00009914636,0.0001012879,0.0001511686,0.000002196994,0.00003478798,0.0001585765,0.00000349145,0.004203684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979511,0.00019541,0.0003188081,0.000047843,0.000005146109,0.00005046793,0.0003293456,0.000003375693,0.001098696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.50915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0539418801052419,"score_gpt":0.2890898637258563,"score_spread":0.2351479836206144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}