{"id":"W2143986371","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00895.x","title":"Assessing the Ecological and Social Benefits of Private Land Conservation in Colorado","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Business; Incentive; Jurisdiction; Land use; Environmental planning; Land tenure; Environmental resource management; Riparian zone; Government (linguistics); Land management; Geography; Zoning; Cadastre; Agriculture; Habitat; Ecology; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002108999,0.00005115991,0.00008853288,0.00002495537,0.0001213914,0.000007635237,0.00007605291,0.00006643698,0.0001729357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005378725,0.00003643281,0.00001129622,0.0001431816,0.0004537851,0.0001100465,0.00008512945,0.0000511491,0.00001508083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001959337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007001318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005329007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003949019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995084,0.00009088158,0.0001536675,0.00010513,0.00004100723,0.0001009371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997105,0.000131768,0.00008965532,0.00005278318,0.000006041712,0.000009255154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006955076,0.00001797144,0.9902018,0.000002638272,0.000002098474,4.549067e-7,0.0001882645,0.00002840021,0.0005082089,0.006772417,0.001774383,0.0004964384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002401976,0.00003292175,0.9860733,0.000001657912,0.000002454638,0.000002177631,0.00001040014,0.001158245,0.00003685655,0.0008260986,0.01157353,0.00004214738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911684,0.0000133683,0.00001198098,0.007348339,0.00003075094,0.0001267664,0.000002650273,0.000009131128,0.001288599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976667,0.00003235641,0.0001497203,0.002018738,0.00001608418,0.000009394694,0.00002140756,0.000002140767,0.00008344706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009799147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1893525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0539418801052419,"score_gpt":0.2890898637258563,"score_spread":0.2351479836206144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}