{"id":"W2144103331","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0023298","title":"Analysis of Variance in Neuroreceptor Ligand Imaging Studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto; Toronto Western Hospital","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Philanthropic Foundation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Hanyang University; University of Warwick","keywords":"Positron emission tomography; Radioligand; Raclopride; Residual; Analysis of variance; Nuclear medicine; Pet imaging; Binding potential; Statistics; Medical physics; Computer science; Medicine; Mathematics; Algorithm; Internal medicine; Striatum","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1238306,0.003202352,0.006959579,0.005083844,0.001927935,0.003457621,0.004013647,0.003677082,0.005338709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3057204,0.001214572,0.005447146,0.005923379,0.004585313,0.00299737,0.003770218,0.006458754,0.0009959011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002127891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003719884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002252139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001315898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7583452,0.1760443,0.01115243,0.02509992,0.02616914,0.003188962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6140618,0.342543,0.008362826,0.02516333,0.008620589,0.001248462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02067027,0.00341977,0.1382827,0.01037249,0.02248315,0.005707602,0.01133368,0.04442684,0.03048864,0.12115,0.02708705,0.5645778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002316711,0.03183638,0.1910646,0.002649561,0.005002823,0.002647778,0.0041679,0.4305633,0.03169102,0.1907006,0.1061886,0.001170839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.07626089,0.002328204,0.9059091,0.000656991,0.002729634,0.004825179,0.001525098,0.001905475,0.00385941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4461674,0.0007579353,0.526253,0.0005823564,0.0005715541,0.02129583,0.001210218,0.001090505,0.002071202],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1238306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6548867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1319629480273435,"score_gpt":0.3263241957304622,"score_spread":0.1943612477031187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}