{"id":"W2144261211","doi":"10.1186/1476-072x-11-32","title":"Spatial access to residential care resources in Beijing, China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Health Geographics","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Beijing; Geography; Geographic information system; Residential area; Equity (law); Population; Catchment area; Environmental planning; Administrative division; Business; Environmental resource management; China; Environmental health; Computer science; Cartography; Medicine; Drainage basin","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003937127,0.0002825902,0.0002726788,0.002128614,0.0006245215,0.0007515219,0.0004770331,0.0001863975,0.002389855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001542914,0.000161758,0.0002550942,0.005375859,0.0004749242,0.0005451426,0.0009155139,0.00009235083,0.0001312939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002876907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002299179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1468758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1912237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995389,0.0001243602,0.00005039281,0.00009337165,0.0001197603,0.00007326778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993729,0.0001471239,0.0001764872,0.00005559965,0.0001484331,0.00009951803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008064599,0.00004139306,0.9429067,0.0002330476,0.000149287,0.0006454965,0.001966438,0.005820291,0.000595194,0.001823296,0.001256011,0.04448225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007779558,0.0000256961,0.9908493,0.00002177474,0.00002978725,0.0001775142,0.001440413,0.004627054,0.0001329764,0.0007305053,0.001943901,0.00001334073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945792,0.0003648039,0.0006585855,0.0001688245,0.000003873437,0.00002837679,0.001440271,0.00002416968,0.002731872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984315,0.0001202671,0.0004230461,0.000006149669,0.000002018605,0.00002219713,0.000566716,0.000001772658,0.0004262202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1468758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2920418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02925804652157639,"score_gpt":0.3953923018240589,"score_spread":0.3661342553024826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}