{"id":"W2144261211","doi":"10.1186/1476-072x-11-32","title":"Spatial access to residential care resources in Beijing, China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Health Geographics","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Beijing; Geography; Geographic information system; Residential area; Equity (law); Population; Catchment area; Environmental planning; Administrative division; Business; Environmental resource management; China; Environmental health; Computer science; Cartography; Medicine; Drainage basin","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002310677,0.00009307799,0.0002137675,0.0006434949,0.000225578,0.000175636,0.0009656544,0.00007784163,0.0001448736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000209746,0.0000876157,0.0001350953,0.0004097294,0.0001076035,0.0009111324,0.0000640449,0.0003371361,0.000003235205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002108686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003900593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02051999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04040769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973596,0.000256185,0.0007397519,0.0001192241,0.001130395,0.0003948433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986227,0.00006615981,0.0004822061,0.0000894549,0.0004344947,0.000304971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007690592,0.00009289925,0.965198,0.00001217142,0.00001853749,0.000009319806,0.02006081,0.00001965837,0.00000166343,0.0002793566,0.0003672585,0.0138634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003058042,0.00004667066,0.9566808,0.000107063,0.000005646113,0.000001793876,0.001906022,0.000001140942,0.00000724195,0.0003433287,0.04051431,0.0000801921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818322,0.002086162,0.0005473625,0.01116692,0.003017902,0.0001589376,0.00001220978,0.00001251955,0.001165758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968182,0.0002910451,0.0002232675,0.0007754777,0.001857572,0.000002520715,0.000004800972,0.000007884648,0.00001924103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04014705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02925804652157639,"score_gpt":0.3953923018240589,"score_spread":0.3661342553024826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}