{"id":"W2144306679","doi":"","title":"THE EFFECT OF PUBLIC SPENDING ON CONSUMPTION : RECONCILING THEORY AND EVIDENCE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Private consumption; Business cycle; Crowding out; Vector autoregression; Econometrics; Consumer spending; Public spending; Empirical evidence; General equilibrium theory; Government spending; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Fiscal policy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001065985,0.000119799,0.0002142736,0.0001319044,0.003076419,0.00002490129,0.0001744471,0.0000792699,0.00001266223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003832962,0.0001126803,0.0000978212,0.000078477,0.0003826602,0.0003159284,0.00008428399,0.0001338003,0.00007025543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008885398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004629809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000904329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001078839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999108,0.00009288236,0.0002835494,0.0002571039,0.0000476889,0.0002107844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986384,0.0008159397,0.000254207,0.0001768535,0.00001311276,0.0001014866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000307319,0.00001180496,0.5578006,0.00003438216,0.0000658631,0.00003754211,0.001463693,0.00006609449,0.0002723181,0.4386553,0.00006687399,0.001218242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001566037,0.0004980057,0.9546241,0.0001750387,0.00003460328,0.0006906754,0.0008592776,0.001941426,0.007142535,0.02309999,0.008925174,0.000443131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.963315,0.01608847,0.0001407394,0.0002355067,0.0002060066,0.0001232549,0.00001209493,0.00002188629,0.01985707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975172,0.000968903,0.00002823322,0.0000369259,0.00005449675,0.000005637693,0.00000157359,0.000006878612,0.00138011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4155553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03155347058192928,"score_gpt":0.1886184743536939,"score_spread":0.1570650037717646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}