{"id":"W2144347256","doi":"10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.15","title":"Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale With a Nonparametric Item Analysis Model.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Assessment","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":431,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Item response theory; Nonparametric statistics; Structural equation modeling; Psychometrics; Scale (ratio); Rating scale; Construct validity; Construct (python library); Differential item functioning; Econometrics; Polytomous Rasch model; Monotonic function; Statistics; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01594533,0.0006070889,0.0006189742,0.001114428,0.0004195715,0.0008526398,0.0008473582,0.0005025501,0.001716322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05527348,0.0004088129,0.0009498409,0.00113298,0.0004692902,0.00131076,0.001654777,0.00127155,0.0004981912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007525141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002450224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002384834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003975063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988356,0.008243957,0.001093718,0.0004791052,0.001701097,0.0001261749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778606,0.01219331,0.001991859,0.002084111,0.005428588,0.0004416775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006965445,0.000900699,0.3882252,0.0006015381,0.0005187786,0.0001977452,0.002696313,0.009758255,0.00504042,0.007803841,0.006218597,0.577342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005915847,0.006451333,0.7480782,0.000766102,0.0006287094,0.001784321,0.003426766,0.1748013,0.005054933,0.01991639,0.03821612,0.0002842824],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4981161,0.0007716955,0.486891,0.000810672,0.0003356286,0.005151883,0.001880316,0.0005273038,0.00551538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.521063,0.0004340739,0.4647504,0.0001694821,0.00005546601,0.009873384,0.002248689,0.00006461768,0.001340874],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01594533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02967717989313187,"score_gpt":0.3902905194857538,"score_spread":0.3606133395926219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}