{"id":"W2144347256","doi":"10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.15","title":"Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale With a Nonparametric Item Analysis Model.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Assessment","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":431,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Item response theory; Nonparametric statistics; Structural equation modeling; Psychometrics; Scale (ratio); Rating scale; Construct validity; Construct (python library); Differential item functioning; Econometrics; Polytomous Rasch model; Monotonic function; Statistics; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003229741,0.000138281,0.00026476,0.000207151,0.0000816372,0.00000826353,0.00016776,0.0001240156,0.0002001004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006742315,0.00007981466,0.00009707559,0.001019792,0.0001231175,0.00005170583,0.00006000598,0.0001825493,0.000005392538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009534399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003009988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006468345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001055384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986142,0.0001166449,0.0004156869,0.0003204233,0.0003614829,0.0001715599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991449,0.0001088679,0.0002987867,0.0003212634,0.00006724336,0.00005892344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000208206,0.002374365,0.933233,0.00002144229,0.0007671144,0.000001027645,0.001581835,0.01877797,0.0003462408,0.009927526,0.000179361,0.03258191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009867182,0.0002018165,0.9766691,0.00001746513,0.0004294497,0.000003394826,0.000262561,0.02061759,0.0002373844,0.0001453863,0.0003039452,0.0001251401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.948406,0.0001275265,0.04120979,0.0004210012,0.00006819995,0.0003340296,0.000008099092,0.00001675857,0.009408598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954343,0.00001724358,0.04497701,0.00008109272,0.00001373088,0.00004049406,0.00002242118,0.000006423375,0.0004985494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04343614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3254747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02967717989313187,"score_gpt":0.3902905194857538,"score_spread":0.3606133395926219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}